Skip to main content

Fabric Landing Zones and Regions

Microsoft Fabric differs from Azure in how regional architecture is handled. While Azure landing zones rely heavily on multi-region strategies for high availability and disaster recovery, Fabric takes a simplified approach, particularly through its centralized data platform: OneLake.

In this article, we explore when regional considerations matter in Fabric, and when a single-region deployment is sufficient. We also examine what a multi-region approach could look like for Microsoft Fabric Landing Zones, especially in scenarios requiring high resilience, sovereignty, or regional data segmentation.

📍 Fabric and Regional Deployment Considerations​

OneLake—the core storage layer of Fabric—is currently deployed within a single region per tenant. Unlike Azure Storage or ADLS Gen2, OneLake doesn't support cross-region replication or active-active deployments out-of-the-box.

However, you can still design for regional requirements through:

  • Multiple Fabric tenants or capacities in different regions.
  • Geographically segmented workspaces and domains.
  • External data replication using pipelines or event-driven architectures.

✅ When Is Multi-Region Fabric Deployment Useful?​

Multi-region deployment becomes relevant in the following scenarios:

ScenarioDescription
Regulatory or data residency requirementsYour organization operates in multiple jurisdictions and must store data within local geographic boundaries.
Disaster recovery planningWhile Fabric doesn't support native geo-redundant OneLake, workloads such as semantic models, notebooks, and reports can be scripted and deployed to another region.
Latency optimizationFor global user bases, deploying Power BI capacities or Fabric workloads closer to end users can reduce query and dashboard rendering latency.
Separation of concernsYou may segment Fabric domains and workspaces by region to delegate responsibility and streamline governance.

🚫 When Is a Single Region Enough?​

In many cases, especially for pilot projects, data lakehouse-centric architectures, or organizations operating within a single legal entity or geography, a single region is sufficient. Benefits include:

  • Reduced complexity in governance.
  • Easier cost tracking and management.
  • Centralized audit and access control via Microsoft Entra and Fabric RBAC.

🧱 Strategies for Multi-Region Support in Fabric​

Although OneLake is region-bound, the following architectural strategies can support multi-region scenarios:

1. Deploy parallel domains​

Establish region-specific Fabric domains (e.g., Domain-EU, Domain-US) under a common governance layer. Each domain can manage its own OneLake workspaces and capacity.

2. Automate replication​

Use Data Factory, Eventstream, or Synapse pipelines to replicate critical data between regions—either in OneLake (staging → replication) or external targets like Azure Blob.

3. Separate capacities​

Create Fabric capacities in different regions and bind workspaces to the appropriate one. This enables localized compute while central governance still applies via Entra ID and deployment pipelines.

4. Implement cross-region disaster recovery plans​

Export artifacts regularly (e.g., semantic models, reports, notebooks) and use Git or Fabric Deployment Pipelines to redeploy in a secondary region.

📊 Diagram: Multi-Region Fabric Landing Zone (Mermaid)​

🧭 Summary​

While Microsoft Fabric simplifies many regional complexities, thoughtful design is still required when:

  • Your workloads span geographies.
  • Compliance or latency concerns apply.
  • You need high-availability and backup strategies across regional boundaries.

Microsoft may extend OneLake to support multi-region capabilities in the future. Until then, multi-tenant or domain-separated strategies are your best option for regional scalability.

For further reference, monitor updates on OneLake roadmap and upcoming BYOK & geo-redundancy capabilities.

Contributors